Science versus religion

[admin]

Evolution was merely a dogma based on philosophy rather than science, as many leading Darwinists and a number of evolutionist commentators have openly admitted.

Evolution was and is a scientific theory based on facts.

You can prove with repeated experiments that Isaac Newton or Michael Faraday were right but you cannot use it to prove that Darwin was right. You can't make any direct observations at all of evolution occurring in the past or in the present.

You can make indirect observations of evolution occurring in the past and direct observations of evolution occurring in the present.
Micro-organism that have a very short lifespan like bacteria evolve constantly.

Here is a video that will explain what is evolution:



Unlike religion that does not believe in evolution science itself evolves.
Old theories always "mutate" and when a new "mutant" theory turns out to be better than the old dominant theory, it replaces it with time. The old theory either dies or finds a narrow niche where it can be used. This is the power of science it always evolves.

And here is why creationism is not correct: